What Is an Opposition to Trademark Publication?
Trademark applications found eligible for publication by TÜRKPATENT appear in the Official Trademark Bulletin. Owners of earlier trademarks or other rights may oppose a published application within the statutory period if they believe it infringes their rights.
An opposition is not limited to similar trademark names. Earlier rights, similarity of the marks and goods or services, likelihood of confusion, reputation and other legal grounds may all be relevant.
Comparing names alone may not be enough. It is important to consider the marks’ visual, phonetic and conceptual features, together with the goods and services covered by the applications.
Missing a similar application can mean missing the opposition deadline. Regular monitoring of a trademark portfolio is therefore an important protective measure.
When Can You File an Opposition?
A new application identical or similar to an earlier trademark may be opposed.
Similarity between the marks and the goods or services they cover may create a likelihood of confusion among consumers.
A trade name, copyright, personal name or other earlier right may provide grounds for opposition in certain cases.
Allegations that an application was filed in bad faith may be raised based on the circumstances of the case.
Appeal Against a TÜRKPATENT Decision
An appeal may be available against a full or partial refusal of a trademark application, a decision on an opposition, or another Office decision affecting the applicant.
An appeal requires more than asking for a second look. The grounds for refusal, applicable law and earlier decisions must be reviewed, and arguments tailored to the application must be prepared.
Appeals against relevant TÜRKPATENT decisions must be filed within the statutory period after notification.
At Marka Patents, we review the decision and help develop an appeal strategy based on the application and available evidence.
What Is a Counterstatement?
If a third party opposes a trademark application, the applicant may submit a counterstatement and defense to TÜRKPATENT.
Preparing a counterstatement involves assessing each ground raised by the opponent, the similarity of the marks, the goods and services, claims to earlier rights, use and the evidence submitted.
An effective counterstatement should explain clearly, systematically and with legal support why the application should proceed to registration.
We examine the legal and factual grounds in the notice of opposition in detail.
We assess visual, phonetic and conceptual similarities between the marks.
We compare the classes and lists of goods and services covered by each mark.
We organize the information, documents and evidence that may support the application.
Proof of Trademark Use
In some trademark opposition proceedings, the applicant may request proof that the earlier mark relied on by the opponent has been genuinely used for the relevant goods or services.
First, the legal requirements for requesting proof of use must be assessed. The request must be made correctly and on time.
Where proof of use is required, the evidence should clearly show where, when, to what extent and for which goods or services the mark was used.
Evidence That May Show Use
A large number of documents alone may not be enough. It is important to show clearly which claim of use each document supports.
What Is the YİDD Process?
The Re-examination and Evaluation Department (YİDD) reviews appeals against certain final decisions issued by the relevant departments of TÜRKPATENT.
If a decision concerning a trademark application, opposition or related matter is believed to be wrong, a request for re-examination may be possible where the legal requirements are met.
At this stage, the original arguments, reasons for the decision, submissions from the parties and evidence in the file are considered together.
Final Review Within the Office
A decision of the Re-examination and Evaluation Board is TÜRKPATENT’s final decision. The same decision cannot be appealed again within the Office.
What Matters in a YİDD Appeal?
The appeal should clearly explain why the decision is considered wrong, which legal grounds should be taken into account and how the evidence should be assessed.
Because this is the final review stage within the Office, a complete file and well-prepared arguments are essential.
Court Proceedings After a YİDD Decision
Decisions of the Re-examination and Evaluation Board are final decisions of TÜRKPATENT.
If a Board decision is believed to be unlawful, an action to annul it may be brought before the Ankara Intellectual and Industrial Property Rights Civil Court within the statutory period after notification.
Court proceedings are separate from the administrative process before TÜRKPATENT. The litigation strategy should take account of the earlier appeals and defenses in the file.
Missing statutory deadlines for oppositions, counterstatements or court actions can result in loss of rights. Notice dates and filing periods should be monitored carefully.
Managing the Process with Marka Patents
At Marka Patents, we provide professional support in preparing and monitoring oppositions to publication, counterstatements, proof of use and appeals against TÜRKPATENT decisions.
We assess each case on its own facts, considering similarity of the marks, the goods and services, earlier rights and available evidence to develop a suitable strategy.
Share the notice date and relevant documents with us so we can assess your case and the options available.
Contact Us →